Peer Evaluation Sheet
Title of the article submitted for evaluation
|
Evaluation |
Relevance of the topic |
x of 5 points |
Level of elaboration |
x of 5 points |
Consistent application of research methods |
x of 5 points |
Structural coherence |
x of 5 points |
Knowledge of relevant literature: |
x of 5 points |
Language and style |
x of 5 points |
Novelty of result |
x of 5 points |
Observance of formal requirements |
x of 5 points |
Total |
x of 40 points |
Revier’s remark in the language of the article: a) I support the publication of the article without alterations b) I support the publication of the article with minor alterations c) I do not support the publication of the article The latter two points must be accounted for. |