Keresés

Keresési eredmények

• Az apostol lappangása a 19. században

  171–186.

  Margócsy István

  Megtekintések száma:

  27

  The Apostle is the most elusive work of Petőfi and its reception is just as telling as the work itself. —The homogenous consensus on Petőfi’s poetry was challenged by The Apostle as it is significantly different from the rest of the oeuvre both in terms of content and poetics. That is why this work was underrated or simply was not mentioned in the early reception; later it was merely interpreted as an ideological and poetical statement without taking into consideration the poetic inventions of the text. Moreover, the whole text was published 25 years aŠfter it had been written, therefore it could not be integrated into the image of Petőfi. —This paper focuses on the presence of the text in the hidden canon of the 19th century, emphasizing that the influential folk-national style could not have come into existence without recognising The Apostle: the text (could have) had the potential of an alternative canonical development because of its irregularities and the obvious ignorance of the categories ’folk’ and ’national’.

• „…Mint napszámos nyúlok iróeszközömhöz…”: Az irodalmi tevékenység mint munka és vállalkozás (Vázlat a 19. századról)

  7–29.

  Margócsy István

  Megtekintések száma:

  276

  This essay focuses on the relationship between Hungarian literature and economy in the nineteenth century. It does not o7er a sociological analysis of the capitalist turn of literary life. Instead, it examines how Hungarian literary authors themselves reflected upon the economic conditions of possibility of making literature. In the first third of the century, literary authors did not aim to earn money with their works: they presented their oeuvre as a sacrifice to the muses or to the nation. By the mid-nineteenth century, a literary market emerged in Hungary and literary authors pictured themselves as active agents on the market. This was the first time writers could earn a living from publishing. By the end of the century, the mass production of literature enabled the emergence of wealthy authors, but it also made literary failure possible, which could result in their impoverishment.