Search



Show Advanced search options Hide Advanced search options
More Additions to Maltby’s Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies and Marangoni’s Supplementum Etymologicum: The Scholia to Statius
Published August 9, 2020
45–56

Etymology has recently become one of the most vibrant spheres of classical scholarship. Maltby’s epoch-making Lexicon has now been complemented by Marangoni’s Supplementum Etymologicum. The present article offers addenda to both. It limits itself to the scholia on Statius.

23
29
Horace on Terence (Epist. 2,1,59)
Published August 1, 2020
21–24

In Horace’s Epistle to Augustus the estimate of Terence may be less positive than is generally believed. This reinterpretation is based first on classical views of acoustic concinnity, then on etymological considerations.

20
47
Sinon on his “pal” Palamedes (Virgil, Aeneid II 81-104)
Published August 1, 2020
151–165

Sinon’s speech to the Trojans falsely represents him as Palamedes’ friend. The present article endeavours to show how in this connection Virgil avails himself of etymology.

20
28
„Read the edge”: Acrostics in Virgil’s Sinon Episode
Published July 24, 2020
45–72

Virgil’s famous Sinon episode at the start of Aeneid II contains four hitherto unidentified acrostics. Examination of these particular instances sheds light on Virgil’s acrostical practice in general.

46
75
MA VE PU again: Kill Caesar! (Georg. I 424–471)
Published July 12, 2020
73–90

This article deals with the Virgilian onomastic in Georgic I 429-433: some fresh considerations are advanced. In particular this sphragis would seem to endorse an overlooked acrostic: “Kill Caesar!”

64
30
Quis est nam ludus in undis? (Virgil, Eclogue IX 39-43)
Published July 8, 2020
43–58

The undis-acrostic that has recently been discovered in Eclogue IX 34-38 has proved problematic. The present article argues that the acrostic’s point is the etymology of litus as the place where these “waves” do not “play” (39: ludus), but “strike” (43: feriant for synonymous but exceed...ingly scarce lidant). This acrostic is accordingly hot-potato politics, since it pertains to the land confiscations round Virgil’s “wave”-begirt Mantua. The poet also provides endorsement in the form of an unidentified onomastic.

Show full abstract
31
44
Jerome’s Dream and the Book of Daniel
Published August 10, 2020
145–149

Recently Smolak has argued that in the famous account of Jerome’s dream (Epist. 22,30,2) the propheta whose language put him off is Daniel. This passage is also connected by Smolak with Jerome’s later reference to Daniel’s clarus sermo (Epist. 53, 8,16): in Smolak’s view Jerome is here claiming that he has now come to ...an understanding of Daniel’s “stilistische Klarheit”. The present article endeavours to refute both of these cases.

Show full abstract
18
43
Acrostic shit (Ecl. IV 47-52)
Published July 8, 2020
21–37

The cacata-acrostic (Ecl. IV 47-52) is considered accidental, as being inconsistent with the dignitas of this “Messianic” Eclogue. It is however possible to demonstrate that Virgil employs such acrostics on other occasions with the object of undercutting such political panegyric. The intentionality of thi...s cacata-acrostic is further buttressed by clues in the lines it spans as well as by winks tipped in other parts of the poem. Pointers to this acrostic are also embedded in the foregoing third Eclogue, especially in the section devoted to Pollio, dedicatee of Eclogue IV. Problematic passages in both these Eclogues are elucidated by the presence of the cacataacrostic.

Show full abstract
75
136
1 - 8 of 8 items